- From
your perspective, what is the Department of Defense’s interest in Nature
Rx as a function of readiness?
First, there are 11.4 million acres owned by DoD - this can be thought of as a giant “pharmacy” at their disposal. Secondly, Total Force Fitness acknowledges environment as a factor, but in a somewhat
negative way - positive, asset-based approaches are needed, and can be
documented, towards servicemember effectiveness and lethality. the same is true for
Military Families.
There is
a DoD funded program that deals with this question, called the Military Families Learning Network. Within it are a number of concentration areas, one
of which I am the director or PI. Its called Community Capacity Building and
for 5 or so years we have been working on this question. There are many
webinars, blog posts and other resources there. In particular, there is a
community capacity inventory and a community capacity building training series.
In those, there is explicit acknowledgement of the outdoor setting, and
importantly, being IN IT - recreating, meditating, eating - as a component of
community capacity, which is the indicator of robust social support structures
for service members and their families.
- What mechanisms drive the therapeutic outcomes of
intentional outdoor-based programs for military service members and their
families?
There
are a number of them -
- How
can outdoor Rx contribute to suicide aversion?
Suicide
comes from places of hopelessness and despair. Nature-based therapies and
antithetical to hopelessness and despair. Observe the struggle of even the
lowly ant. No ability to relinquish the desire to be alive, to stay alive. Even
when doom is near. For the ant, life persists, demands to continue. EO Wilson
and Stephen Kellert worked with me to refine Biophilia thinking, the affinity
we humans have to other life, to LIVING. Urgent Biophilia is this force
that must be tapped into. Urgent Biophilia is a complex system of values,
motivations and behaviors that give rise to life affirming actions, that lift
us from hopelessness and despair, on the wings of other life.
- Can you talk about citizen science, and its place in
this nature-based exercise work?
In my work, citizen science is a great “rally point” - it
provides tight focus on task and purpose, but does so in a redemptive rather
than destructive way. As an Infantry guy, the mission, the job description is
“close with and kill the enemy.” But balance is needed. Can those skills and
talents, those mindsets be brought to bear for LIFE? Citizen science
opportunities for veterans and service members provide evidence that they can.
This is therapeutic.
- Can you talk about the importance of breaking down this
work into its pieces (e.g., social aspect—solitary or group; exact
environment—forested vs. water; type of activity; exercise duration and
intensity)?
I think of it as a three-legged stool. First, the importance
of group work, at least initially, cannot be overstated. The “small unit
camaraderie” analogs and the host of shared experience interaction types are
bedrock “pieces” if you will, a leg of the stool.
A second leg is setting. Water lends a certain kind of
context, but so do forests, mountains, deserts, etc. The key is awe, and the
potential to re-frame the self in a living system. This is also critical.
The third leg is Task & Purpose (achievement helps, but
isn’t critical). To feel meaningfully engaged, up to the task, prepared,
essential to mission - these are all baked in to the soldier, sailor, airmen or
marine.
Later, after multiple evolutions, participants who have
regained or restored an identity as a “competent operator”, they move into more
solitary modes ,improving upon mastery, but still relying on the communal base
of their fellows. The
penultimate evolution is mastery of the outdoor recreation type - but the
ultimate evolution is actualization, of the transfiguration of
recreation into conservation, when the two become indistinguishable. We no
longer see legs and a seat, we see a stool.
- Are there special
considerations for active duty or vets? If they are different, how?
I really don’t know. I think the theories I have laid
out hold, but certainly there are unique considerations. The edge cannot be
lost for warriors, and they are not yet suffering the dislocation of being
removed from the “small unit cohesion” dynamic and the Task and purpose
dynamic. I want to get into this area further.